Jump to content


Photo

Puro Puro Fix



  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
1 reply to this topic

Posted 11 December 2018 - 07:33 PM #1

EIM Django
Super Donator

EIM Django
Posts: 88
Likes: 159
Clan: ICE
Location: Iowa


  • Member since:
    12 Nov 2018

    • Time spent:
      15d 6h 13m 17s

  • Total level:
    2,206
    Awards

What is your suggestion?:

 

Increase spawns of the higher level implings within Puro Puro.  To my understanding the top few implings are on the same spawn table, which leaves Puro Puro in a broken state.  Currently speaking I've ran around Puro Puro for 30mins+ and seen zero Magpie, zero Ninja, and zero Dragon Implings.  However, there were two lucky implings.

 

Is this in OSRS?:

 

Yes, OSRS has more spawns of these implings in-game than we do here in Alora.

 

Has this suggestion been accepted already?:

 

No, there have been suggestions towards Binding implings and buffing exp rates though. (Puro Puro Remake?)

 

How would this benefit Alora?:

 

Currently for ironmen the best way to get dragon darts and arrows is through dragon implings, and currently with the minigame as it is, grinding hunter past 73 (Black Chins) is pointless, as no higher level implings are around.  (Unless going for Lucky Implings 89 Hunter)


Edited by EIM Django, 11 December 2018 - 07:35 PM.

Posted Image

Promoted to Server Support on December 25th, 2018

Promoted to Server Moderator on January 20th, 2019


Posted 11 December 2018 - 07:40 PM #2

Immortal Fox
Veteran

Immortal Fox
Posts: 198
Likes: 984
Clan: #Cheeselog
Location: Staff Zone



  • Member since:
    22 Sep 2018

    • Time spent:
      133d 21h 33m 39s

  • Total level:
    2,243
    Awards

You can catch the lower tier imps inorder to increase the spawnrates of Dragon/Lucky implings. This has been suggested many times.

 

https://www.alora.io...?hl=+puro +puro


Your suggestion has been declined, if you feel this was wrongfully done please contact a Forum Moderator+.


Posted Image





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic has been visited by 4 user(s)