I think that there's a massive flaw with rule 9 (multi-logging).
Taken directly from the ::rules thread, the entire purpose of the rule is to prevent unfair advantages over other players in the game. I get it. That's understandable and I support the rule. However, and correct me if I'm wrong, there doesn't seem to be any rationale behind limiting players to a maximum of 3 connections, specifically if 3 of those accounts aren't even able to interact with each other, by game design.
It doesn't make a whole lot of sense that I would be risking a bank wipe or other punishment if I wanted to play a solo 3-man (HC)GIM while bank-standing on my main @ ::dz or edge bank or even playing on that account as well. For clarity, the purpose of doing a 3-man vs. a 2-man group would be to be on the highscores. This is just one example, but there are others as well.
I know a lot of people don't play this way and because of that it might not garner a lot of support, but I think I bring up a valid point.
Thx