32 replies to this topic

[Selenagomez]

nah explain the benefits and any concerns you might have of why you are supporting

[H]

If it's that much effort to type a few words on why you support the suggestion, then it's best you refrain from commenting and simply leave a like on the topic to show your support.

 

No support.

[Variant]

nah explain the benefits and any concerns you might have of why you are supporting

so do the same with "no support" comments? or any comment that says support/no support with no further context and just random sentences so they dont get in trouble?

If it's that much effort to type a few words on why you support the suggestion, then it's best you refrain from commenting and simply leave a like on the topic to show your support.

 

No support.

then do the same with no support comments, or comments that give no context on why they do or dont support, the ones that are like "support and this is so i dont get a warning" etc

[H]

so do the same with "no support" comments? or any comment that says support/no support with no further context and just random sentences so they dont get in trouble?

then do the same with no support comments, or comments that give no context on why they do or dont support, the ones that are like "support and this is so i dont get a warning" etc

If that's what the community wants, the admin team could discuss it and perhaps warn people that don't provide meaningful input to threads.

[Selenagomez]

so do the same with "no support" comments? or any comment that says support/no support with no further context and just random sentences so they dont get in trouble?

then do the same with no support comments, or comments that give no context on why they do or dont support, the ones that are like "support and this is so i dont get a warning" etc

>suggests less hall monitoring

>suggests more hall monitoring

 

CONFUSED JACKIE CHAN

[Variant]

>suggests less hall monitoring
>suggests more hall monitoring

CONFUSED JACKIE CHAN

You’re confused for other reasons, but if I really have to spell it out for you, I want less hall monitoring, but your reasoning has a double standard I’m also pointing out. To go further, some suggestions that have support genuinely have no other context players can or can’t add. Sometimes it’s simple but well laid out suggestions with no real further context added outside of a “support” or “no support” . It’s mind boggling to me that staff can’t figure out what is true spam, and what’s someone simply trying to state they support a suggestion

If that's what the community wants, the admin team could discuss it and perhaps warn people that don't provide meaningful input to threads.

The community is pretty clear so far on the voting process, doing these meaningless punishments discourages players from interacting with the forums if yall are hall monitoring genuine non issues

[H]

The community is pretty clear so far on the voting process, doing these meaningless punishments discourages players from interacting with the forums if yall are hall monitoring genuine non issues

You're suggesting for us to be lenient on the "support" spam, and then you're telling us to enforce the rule by punishing people for saying "no support" as well, and now you're telling me this.

 

Also, the word "interacting" is doing very heavy lifting here.

[Variant]

You're suggesting for us to be lenient on the "support" spam, and then you're telling us to enforce the rule by punishing people for saying "no support" as well, and now you're telling me this.
 
Also, the word "interacting" is doing very heavy lifting here.

My wants: less hall monitoring, monitor genuine spam, not players engaging with a forums that is majority dead as is

You say: no we won’t do that because “x”

I say, well “x” applies to other things, which if it’s going to apply fairly it should be across the board. Do I still prefer less hall monitoring? Yes. Would I take a more fair system? Also, yes.

[Radagon]

That also goes for No support though, but No support is fine but Support isnt

Whatever you say, zoner

[QC]

Whatever you say, zoner

Dam I didnt mean to get under your skin buddy. Can you please elaborate on what zoner means? English is not my first language

[Radagon]

Dam I didnt mean to get under your skin buddy. Can you please elaborate on what zoner means? English is not my first language

It’s just an inside afm joke about the name qc, no harm done xd

[QC]

It’s just an inside afm joke about the name qc, no harm done xd

Ahh thats why I wasnt able to understand it, im not in AFM haha When I requested name change I didnt know we had "Q C" since he hasnt played much since I joined the server 2 months ago. 

But I met him recently and we had some good chats haha 

[Tauri]

Hi!

 

It is labeled as Game Suggestion, but obviously should be a Forum Suggestion.

 

We are not planning to change the rule of one word posts in threads, we would rather see more impact and opinions on threads rather than "support" for the entire front page of a suggestion.

 

If there are people that may struggle with finding proper words to express their support to a suggestion, they can just opt to like the suggestion and show their support that way.

Your suggestion has been declined, if you feel this was wrongfully done please contact a Senior Moderator+.