23

Thanks for hosting @Moe

Thanks for the updates and bug fixes

https://gyazo.com/86...f05f2ca3aec166d

 

Got a TBow at 83 KC!  Super excited about this

Congrats all! @Kohlrabi @Mieu @Sakura @18 @Gl

@Zeeva

Welcome! Love the thread, great goals. Which pet we thinking for the side project?

I can’t see any drawbacks, support from me

Should be a fun event!  Good luck everyone and thank you to the two donors for making this possible

 

@Reload @leroyjankins

Only concerns would be a system like this damaging the market on some of these items. Could potentially add it as a gold sink (obviously cheaper than buying but still substantial enough to encourage buying your own set.). Another option could be limiting it to first so many hours of an account.

I’m half and half on this one. I think my concerns regarding the overall eco on items such as claws are greater than the temporary barrier to entering some higher tiered events. We have such a wide array of events, it’s okay to not be able to participate in every one.

For now, I’m going to no support but will watch for other view points.

(Good job on the suggestion thread though!)

Great read, love seeing all the accomplishments!  Good work @H and excited to see next month's @18 !

Love the presentation of this suggestion. Very high quality post.

As for the suggestion itself, I’m not opposed to the implementation. I would like to see a reduction in GP produced since you’re effectively guaranteeing an inventory vs. I get tired after 3 and leave. Exp would need to be considered as well but less worried about that honestly.

Another idea, add the 1 click benefit as a higher tier perk. Green donor gets access, blue donor gets 1 click?

BIGGG... is it the full inferno or do you start few waves in?

You start on a different wave depending on your donator rank.  I was pleased considering first time at Zuk haha.  Thanks

Congratz @RG12 !

The item number wouldn't be the issue. I think it would be an entity number issue since they roam your POH.

It’s probably been 15 years since I actually used the menagerie in actual RuneScape. Wasn’t there a cap on how many displayed roaming around?

Not sure from a coding side but a clean way to do this would be to have the actual pet house act like a bank for pets allowing quantities of the physical item than have the poh only display 1 of each pet in the game world (ie, your POH as an entity). Since the idea behind this suggestion is QOL, I don’t particularly care about how it would be implemented but more ease of implementation. If a right click dismiss option is the easier (and less disruptive) path, that would be the one I’d support. Same with treating menagerie as a storage unit.

While I agree with you, ummmm, well...... you'd be surprised. You're essentially trading an inconvenience, for an actual problem at that point.
You could almost tho, add something like a pet storage that doesn’t affect any other inventories, where you right click, “send to pet inventory”. Where a pet Inventory could be any type of storage concept, I haven’t thought that out.

I wouldn’t be surprised but at some point, the onus is on the player to read the confirm screen.

I do like the idea of pet storage though. RS3 had a menagerie once in the poh before they removed pets as physical items. Could be a neat interface here. Would be kind of custom though so not sure how doable.

So i created this account in 2018, is there no veteran status i can get?

Let’s get that forum time up! You’ll be there in no time . Cool to see other 2018 players!